Nicaraguan vs Comanche Family Poverty
COMPARE
Nicaraguan
Comanche
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Nicaraguans
Comanche
10.6%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
248th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.0%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
267th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Nicaraguan vs Comanche Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 285,444,498 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Nicaraguans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.372 and weighted average of 10.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,722,823 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Comanche and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.506 and weighted average of 11.0%, a difference of 4.0%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Nicaraguan | Comanche |
| Minimum | 3.3% | 4.3% |
| Maximum | 31.8% | 50.0% |
| Range | 28.5% | 45.7% |
| Mean | 11.2% | 14.5% |
| Median | 10.2% | 13.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.2% | 10.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.6% | 15.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.4% | 5.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.0% | 8.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.9% | 8.4% |
Demographics Similar to Nicaraguans and Comanche by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Nicaraguans are Cuban (10.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Liberian (10.6%, a difference of 0.20%), Salvadoran (10.7%, a difference of 0.57%), Iroquois (10.7%, a difference of 0.86%), and Immigrants from Zaire (10.7%, a difference of 0.98%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Comanche are Immigrants from El Salvador (11.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (10.9%, a difference of 0.91%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (10.9%, a difference of 0.97%), Cape Verdean (10.9%, a difference of 0.99%), and Spanish American Indian (10.9%, a difference of 1.3%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Liberians | 0.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 10.6% |
| Nicaraguans | 0.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 10.6% |
| Cubans | 0.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 10.6% |
| Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Iroquois | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Chickasaw | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Shoshone | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 11.0% |
| Comanche | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 11.0% |