Nicaraguan vs Cherokee Family Poverty
COMPARE
Nicaraguan
Cherokee
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Nicaraguans
Cherokee
10.6%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
248th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.6%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
246th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Nicaraguan vs Cherokee Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 285,444,498 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Nicaraguans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.372 and weighted average of 10.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 492,113,161 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.408 and weighted average of 10.6%, a difference of 0.29%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Nicaraguan | Cherokee |
Minimum | 3.3% | 2.9% |
Maximum | 31.8% | 50.0% |
Range | 28.5% | 47.1% |
Mean | 11.2% | 15.7% |
Median | 10.2% | 13.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.2% | 10.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.6% | 17.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.4% | 6.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.0% | 8.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.9% | 8.4% |
Demographics Similar to Nicaraguans and Cherokee by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Nicaraguans are Cuban (10.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Liberian (10.6%, a difference of 0.20%), Salvadoran (10.7%, a difference of 0.57%), Iroquois (10.7%, a difference of 0.86%), and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (10.5%, a difference of 0.93%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Liberian (10.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Cuban (10.6%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (10.5%, a difference of 0.64%), Salvadoran (10.7%, a difference of 0.87%), and Iroquois (10.7%, a difference of 1.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Laos | 1.7 /100 | #237 | Tragic 10.2% |
French American Indians | 1.5 /100 | #238 | Tragic 10.2% |
Potawatomi | 1.5 /100 | #239 | Tragic 10.2% |
Immigrants | Azores | 1.4 /100 | #240 | Tragic 10.3% |
Ghanaians | 1.3 /100 | #241 | Tragic 10.3% |
Alaska Natives | 1.0 /100 | #242 | Tragic 10.4% |
Nepalese | 0.8 /100 | #243 | Tragic 10.4% |
Cree | 0.7 /100 | #244 | Tragic 10.5% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 10.5% |
Cherokee | 0.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 10.6% |
Liberians | 0.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 10.6% |
Nicaraguans | 0.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 10.6% |
Cubans | 0.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 10.6% |
Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 10.7% |
Iroquois | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 10.7% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 10.7% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 10.7% |
Ecuadorians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 10.8% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 10.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 10.8% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 10.8% |