Spanish American vs Comanche Family Poverty
COMPARE
Spanish American
Comanche
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Spanish Americans
Comanche
11.2%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
274th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.0%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
267th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Spanish American vs Comanche Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 103,138,189 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Spanish Americans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.669 and weighted average of 11.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,722,823 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Comanche and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.506 and weighted average of 11.0%, a difference of 1.5%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Spanish American | Comanche |
Minimum | 3.4% | 4.3% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 50.0% |
Range | 96.6% | 45.7% |
Mean | 16.8% | 14.5% |
Median | 10.5% | 13.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.4% | 10.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.2% | 15.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.8% | 5.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 18.6% | 8.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 18.4% | 8.4% |
Demographics Similar to Spanish Americans and Comanche by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Spanish Americans are Central American (11.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Guyana (11.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Somali (11.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Chippewa (11.2%, a difference of 0.16%), and Guyanese (11.2%, a difference of 0.19%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Comanche are Immigrants from El Salvador (11.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Jamaican (11.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Ecuador (11.1%, a difference of 0.58%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (11.1%, a difference of 0.59%), and Immigrants from Bahamas (11.1%, a difference of 0.84%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Bangladeshis | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 10.9% |
Shoshone | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 10.9% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 10.9% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 10.9% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 10.9% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 10.9% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 11.0% |
Comanche | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 11.0% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 11.1% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 11.1% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 11.1% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 11.1% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 11.2% |
Somalis | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 11.2% |
Spanish Americans | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 11.2% |
Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 11.2% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #276 | Tragic 11.2% |
Chippewa | 0.1 /100 | #277 | Tragic 11.2% |
Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #278 | Tragic 11.2% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 11.3% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 11.3% |