Immigrants from El Salvador vs Cherokee Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from El Salvador
Cherokee
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from El Salvador
Cherokee
11.0%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
266th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.6%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
246th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from El Salvador vs Cherokee Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 357,239,196 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from El Salvador and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.072 and weighted average of 11.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 492,113,161 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.408 and weighted average of 10.6%, a difference of 4.3%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from El Salvador | Cherokee |
| Minimum | 2.4% | 2.9% |
| Maximum | 30.5% | 50.0% |
| Range | 28.2% | 47.1% |
| Mean | 11.1% | 15.7% |
| Median | 10.7% | 13.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.4% | 10.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.0% | 17.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.5% | 6.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.8% | 8.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.7% | 8.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from El Salvador and Cherokee by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from El Salvador are Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (10.9%, a difference of 0.90%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (10.9%, a difference of 0.95%), Cape Verdean (10.9%, a difference of 0.97%), Spanish American Indian (10.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and Shoshone (10.9%, a difference of 1.4%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Liberian (10.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Nicaraguan (10.6%, a difference of 0.29%), Cuban (10.6%, a difference of 0.34%), Salvadoran (10.7%, a difference of 0.87%), and Iroquois (10.7%, a difference of 1.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Cherokee | 0.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 10.6% |
| Liberians | 0.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 10.6% |
| Nicaraguans | 0.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 10.6% |
| Cubans | 0.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 10.6% |
| Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Iroquois | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Chickasaw | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Shoshone | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 11.0% |