Sudanese vs Cherokee Family Poverty
COMPARE
Sudanese
Cherokee
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Sudanese
Cherokee
10.0%
FAMILY POVERTY
3.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
228th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.6%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
246th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sudanese vs Cherokee Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 110,085,531 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Sudanese and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.527 and weighted average of 10.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 492,113,161 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.408 and weighted average of 10.6%, a difference of 5.7%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Sudanese | Cherokee |
| Minimum | 1.9% | 2.9% |
| Maximum | 36.9% | 50.0% |
| Range | 35.0% | 47.1% |
| Mean | 11.5% | 15.7% |
| Median | 9.2% | 13.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.3% | 10.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.1% | 17.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.8% | 6.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.3% | 8.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.3% | 8.4% |
Demographics Similar to Sudanese and Cherokee by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Sudanese are Immigrants from Uzbekistan (10.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Panama (10.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Armenia (10.0%, a difference of 0.20%), Alaskan Athabascan (10.1%, a difference of 0.41%), and Immigrants from Sudan (10.1%, a difference of 0.85%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Liberian (10.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (10.5%, a difference of 0.64%), Cree (10.5%, a difference of 1.3%), Nepalese (10.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and Alaska Native (10.4%, a difference of 2.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 3.3 /100 | #227 | Tragic 10.0% |
| Sudanese | 3.1 /100 | #228 | Tragic 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 3.1 /100 | #229 | Tragic 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 3.1 /100 | #230 | Tragic 10.0% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 2.7 /100 | #231 | Tragic 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 2.3 /100 | #232 | Tragic 10.1% |
| Fijians | 2.1 /100 | #233 | Tragic 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 2.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 10.1% |
| Nigerians | 2.0 /100 | #235 | Tragic 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 1.9 /100 | #236 | Tragic 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 1.7 /100 | #237 | Tragic 10.2% |
| French American Indians | 1.5 /100 | #238 | Tragic 10.2% |
| Potawatomi | 1.5 /100 | #239 | Tragic 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 1.4 /100 | #240 | Tragic 10.3% |
| Ghanaians | 1.3 /100 | #241 | Tragic 10.3% |
| Alaska Natives | 1.0 /100 | #242 | Tragic 10.4% |
| Nepalese | 0.8 /100 | #243 | Tragic 10.4% |
| Cree | 0.7 /100 | #244 | Tragic 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 10.5% |
| Cherokee | 0.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 10.6% |
| Liberians | 0.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 10.6% |