Iranian vs Turkish Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Iranian
Turkish
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Iranians
Turks
18.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
16th/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
36th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Iranian vs Turkish Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 312,309,917 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Iranians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.024 and weighted average of 18.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 268,182,441 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.312 and weighted average of 18.7%, a difference of 3.8%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Iranian | Turkish |
| Minimum | 3.3% | 1.7% |
| Maximum | 41.3% | 67.9% |
| Range | 38.0% | 66.2% |
| Mean | 18.1% | 20.0% |
| Median | 16.7% | 16.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.7% | 13.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.1% | 19.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.4% | 6.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.1% | 14.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.0% | 14.6% |
Demographics Similar to Iranians and Turks by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Iranians are Immigrants from Korea (18.1%, a difference of 0.60%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (18.1%, a difference of 0.88%), Immigrants from China (18.1%, a difference of 0.91%), Immigrants from Greece (18.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and Maltese (18.3%, a difference of 1.7%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Immigrants from Japan (18.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Korean (18.6%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Philippines (18.6%, a difference of 0.42%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (18.6%, a difference of 0.49%), and Immigrants from Asia (18.6%, a difference of 0.57%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 18.0% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 18.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 18.1% |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 18.1% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Armenians | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 18.4% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 18.5% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 18.5% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 18.5% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 18.6% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 18.6% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 18.6% |
| Koreans | 99.9 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 18.6% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 18.6% |
| Turks | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 18.7% |