Indian (Asian) vs Immigrants from Taiwan Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Indian (Asian)
Immigrants from Taiwan
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Indians (Asian)
Immigrants from Taiwan
17.9%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
15th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Indian (Asian) vs Immigrants from Taiwan Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 483,253,971 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.190 and weighted average of 17.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 293,913,772 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Taiwan and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.000 and weighted average of 16.4%, a difference of 9.8%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Indian (Asian) | Immigrants from Taiwan |
| Minimum | 4.6% | 4.7% |
| Maximum | 26.6% | 37.2% |
| Range | 21.9% | 32.5% |
| Mean | 15.3% | 14.7% |
| Median | 15.4% | 13.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.4% | 11.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.6% | 16.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.2% | 4.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.6% | 5.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.6% | 5.8% |
Demographics Similar to Indians (Asian) and Immigrants from Taiwan by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Indians (Asian) are Bolivian (17.9%, a difference of 0.15%), Iranian (18.0%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Bolivia (17.8%, a difference of 0.59%), Immigrants from Korea (18.1%, a difference of 0.76%), and Immigrants from South Central Asia (17.8%, a difference of 0.85%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Taiwan are Immigrants from Hong Kong (16.5%, a difference of 1.1%), Chinese (16.1%, a difference of 1.3%), Immigrants from India (16.8%, a difference of 2.8%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (17.0%, a difference of 3.7%), and Filipino (17.0%, a difference of 3.9%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 16.4% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 16.5% |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 16.8% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 17.3% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 17.5% |
| Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 17.7% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 17.9% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 17.9% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 18.0% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 18.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 18.1% |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 18.1% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 18.3% |