Korean vs Cypriot Male Poverty
COMPARE
Korean
Cypriot
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Koreans
Cypriots
9.9%
MALE POVERTY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
41st/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.9%
MALE POVERTY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
40th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Korean vs Cypriot Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 510,064,453 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Koreans and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.042 and weighted average of 9.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,836,468 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Cypriots and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.163 and weighted average of 9.9%, a difference of 0.10%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Korean | Cypriot |
| Minimum | 2.6% | 1.2% |
| Maximum | 18.6% | 21.1% |
| Range | 16.0% | 19.9% |
| Mean | 9.1% | 8.1% |
| Median | 8.5% | 7.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.7% | 4.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.9% | 10.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.2% | 6.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.4% | 5.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.4% | 4.9% |
Demographics Similar to Koreans and Cypriots by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Koreans are Russian (9.9%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Pakistan (9.9%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Iran (9.9%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Moldova (9.9%, a difference of 0.50%), and Immigrants from Greece (9.8%, a difference of 0.55%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cypriots are Russian (9.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Pakistan (9.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Iran (9.9%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Greece (9.8%, a difference of 0.46%), and Immigrants from Moldova (9.9%, a difference of 0.60%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Poles | 99.5 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Tongans | 99.5 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Macedonians | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.5 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 99.5 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 9.8% |
| Iranians | 99.4 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 9.8% |
| Czechs | 99.4 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 99.3 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.2 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Russians | 99.2 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Cypriots | 99.2 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Koreans | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 99.1 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 99.0 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 98.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 98.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Turks | 98.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 98.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 98.8 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Slovenes | 98.8 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 98.7 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 10.0% |