Choctaw vs British Female Poverty
COMPARE
Choctaw
British
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Choctaw
British
16.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
303rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
95.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
96th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Choctaw vs British Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 269,592,766 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.540 and weighted average of 16.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 530,738,327 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of British and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.656 and weighted average of 12.5%, a difference of 34.8%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Choctaw | British |
| Minimum | 10.0% | 2.7% |
| Maximum | 68.1% | 100.0% |
| Range | 58.1% | 97.3% |
| Mean | 23.7% | 18.5% |
| Median | 21.6% | 12.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.4% | 9.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.6% | 16.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.2% | 6.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.5% | 18.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.5% | 18.1% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Choctaw by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Immigrants from Central America (16.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Grenada (16.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Caribbean (16.9%, a difference of 0.33%), Seminole (16.9%, a difference of 0.46%), and African (16.9%, a difference of 0.52%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Senegal | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 16.6% |
| Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 16.6% |
| Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 16.6% |
| Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 17.0% |
Demographics Similar to British by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to British are Australian (12.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Native Hawaiian (12.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from South Africa (12.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Romanian (12.5%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Indonesia (12.5%, a difference of 0.11%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| English | 96.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 95.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Belgians | 95.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Czechoslovakians | 95.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 95.5 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 95.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| British | 95.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Australians | 95.2 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Native Hawaiians | 95.1 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Romanians | 95.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 94.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 94.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | China | 94.5 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Slavs | 94.5 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 12.5% |