Israeli vs Chilean Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Israeli
Chilean
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Israelis
Chileans
19.9%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
96.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
105th/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.9%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
96.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
104th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Israeli vs Chilean Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 208,686,807 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Israelis and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.397 and weighted average of 19.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 254,415,237 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.700 and weighted average of 19.9%, a difference of 0.010%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Israeli | Chilean |
| Minimum | 5.6% | 1.8% |
| Maximum | 32.2% | 100.0% |
| Range | 26.6% | 98.2% |
| Mean | 16.8% | 25.9% |
| Median | 16.5% | 19.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.4% | 17.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.0% | 25.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.6% | 7.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.8% | 20.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.7% | 20.1% |
Demographics Similar to Israelis and Chileans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Israelis are Ethiopian (19.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Syria (19.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (19.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Native Hawaiian (19.9%, a difference of 0.16%), and Colombian (19.9%, a difference of 0.17%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Ethiopian (19.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (19.9%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Syria (19.9%, a difference of 0.12%), Native Hawaiian (19.9%, a difference of 0.17%), and Colombian (19.9%, a difference of 0.18%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Romanians | 98.6 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 19.6% |
| Estonians | 98.2 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 19.7% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 98.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 19.7% |
| Croatians | 98.1 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 19.7% |
| Immigrants | France | 97.9 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 19.7% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 97.9 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 19.7% |
| Ukrainians | 97.6 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 19.8% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 97.3 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 19.8% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 97.3 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 19.8% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 97.1 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Chileans | 96.9 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Israelis | 96.9 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Ethiopians | 96.7 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 96.7 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Native Hawaiians | 96.6 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Colombians | 96.6 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 96.5 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 96.1 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 96.0 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 95.9 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 95.9 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 20.0% |