Iroquois vs Comanche Male Poverty
COMPARE
Iroquois
Comanche
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Iroquois
Comanche
13.2%
MALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
264th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.8%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
283rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Iroquois vs Comanche Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,214,183 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.608 and weighted average of 13.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,752,173 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Comanche and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.184 and weighted average of 13.8%, a difference of 4.1%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Iroquois | Comanche |
Minimum | 3.6% | 5.5% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 38.9% |
Range | 96.4% | 33.4% |
Mean | 19.1% | 16.6% |
Median | 14.9% | 14.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.5% | 11.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.1% | 20.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.5% | 9.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.8% | 7.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.6% | 7.6% |
Demographics Similar to Iroquois and Comanche by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Jamaican (13.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Guyana (13.2%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Jamaica (13.3%, a difference of 0.28%), Subsaharan African (13.3%, a difference of 0.30%), and Central American (13.2%, a difference of 0.36%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Comanche are Immigrants from Cabo Verde (13.7%, a difference of 0.20%), Yaqui (13.7%, a difference of 0.48%), Mexican (13.7%, a difference of 0.52%), Haitian (13.7%, a difference of 0.62%), and Belizean (13.6%, a difference of 0.80%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 13.2% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 13.2% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 13.2% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 13.2% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 13.3% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 13.3% |
Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #269 | Tragic 13.3% |
Cree | 0.0 /100 | #270 | Tragic 13.3% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 13.4% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 13.5% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 13.5% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 13.5% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 13.6% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 13.6% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 13.6% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 13.6% |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 13.7% |
Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 13.7% |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 13.7% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 13.7% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 13.8% |