Iroquois vs Liberian Male Poverty
COMPARE
Iroquois
Liberian
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Iroquois
Liberians
13.2%
MALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
264th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.8%
MALE POVERTY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
245th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Iroquois vs Liberian Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,214,183 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.608 and weighted average of 13.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,033,924 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Liberians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.422 and weighted average of 12.8%, a difference of 3.2%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Iroquois | Liberian |
Minimum | 3.6% | 0.17% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 40.3% |
Range | 96.4% | 40.1% |
Mean | 19.1% | 12.9% |
Median | 14.9% | 12.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.5% | 8.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.1% | 15.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.5% | 6.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.8% | 6.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.6% | 6.8% |
Demographics Similar to Iroquois and Liberians by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Central American (13.2%, a difference of 0.36%), Spanish American Indian (13.1%, a difference of 0.76%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (13.1%, a difference of 0.81%), Ottawa (13.1%, a difference of 0.83%), and Cherokee (13.1%, a difference of 0.95%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Liberians are Tsimshian (12.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from El Salvador (12.8%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Western Africa (12.9%, a difference of 0.65%), Immigrants from Sudan (12.9%, a difference of 0.71%), and Potawatomi (12.9%, a difference of 0.79%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Tsimshian | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 12.8% |
Liberians | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 12.8% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.2 /100 | #246 | Tragic 12.8% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.2 /100 | #247 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 0.2 /100 | #248 | Tragic 12.9% |
Potawatomi | 0.2 /100 | #249 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.2 /100 | #250 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.2 /100 | #251 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.2 /100 | #252 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 12.9% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #254 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #255 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #256 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 13.1% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 13.1% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 13.1% |
Ottawa | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 13.1% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 13.1% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 13.1% |
Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 13.2% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 13.2% |