Iroquois vs Comanche Female Poverty
COMPARE
Iroquois
Comanche
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Iroquois
Comanche
15.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
269th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
285th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Iroquois vs Comanche Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,228,109 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.698 and weighted average of 15.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,749,855 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Comanche and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.443 and weighted average of 16.2%, a difference of 2.2%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Iroquois | Comanche |
Minimum | 4.7% | 8.4% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 60.0% |
Range | 95.3% | 51.6% |
Mean | 22.4% | 20.0% |
Median | 16.7% | 17.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.0% | 14.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.5% | 23.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.5% | 9.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 19.0% | 10.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 18.8% | 10.3% |
Demographics Similar to Iroquois and Comanche by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Chickasaw (15.9%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (15.8%, a difference of 0.37%), Subsaharan African (15.8%, a difference of 0.43%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (15.9%, a difference of 0.54%), and Belizean (15.9%, a difference of 0.76%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Comanche are Spanish American (16.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Cuba (16.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Haiti (16.1%, a difference of 0.21%), West Indian (16.1%, a difference of 0.36%), and Vietnamese (16.1%, a difference of 0.38%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 15.9% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 16.0% |
Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 16.0% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 16.0% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 16.1% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 16.1% |
Vietnamese | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 16.1% |
West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 16.1% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 16.1% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 16.1% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 16.2% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 16.2% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 16.2% |
Immigrants | Belize | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 16.3% |