Subsaharan African vs Alaskan Athabascan Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Subsaharan African
Alaskan Athabascan
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Sub-Saharan Africans
Alaskan Athabascans
23.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
271st/ 347
METRIC RANK
23.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
279th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Subsaharan African vs Alaskan Athabascan Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 498,393,739 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.125 and weighted average of 23.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,584,348 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.362 and weighted average of 23.6%, a difference of 1.8%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Subsaharan African | Alaskan Athabascan |
| Minimum | 2.8% | 6.0% |
| Maximum | 60.3% | 100.0% |
| Range | 57.5% | 94.0% |
| Mean | 23.6% | 41.2% |
| Median | 22.9% | 33.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 19.3% | 20.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 26.2% | 51.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.9% | 31.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.9% | 28.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.8% | 28.7% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans and Alaskan Athabascans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Senegal (23.2%, a difference of 0.19%), Inupiat (23.1%, a difference of 0.25%), Alaska Native (23.3%, a difference of 0.44%), Marshallese (23.3%, a difference of 0.45%), and Hmong (23.1%, a difference of 0.50%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Nonimmigrants (23.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Pennsylvania German (23.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from the Azores (23.5%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Latin America (23.7%, a difference of 0.49%), and Immigrants from Zaire (23.8%, a difference of 1.0%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Central Americans | 0.2 /100 | #265 | Tragic 23.0% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.2 /100 | #266 | Tragic 23.0% |
| Senegalese | 0.2 /100 | #267 | Tragic 23.0% |
| Fijians | 0.2 /100 | #268 | Tragic 23.1% |
| Hmong | 0.2 /100 | #269 | Tragic 23.1% |
| Inupiat | 0.2 /100 | #270 | Tragic 23.1% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 23.2% |
| Immigrants | Senegal | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 23.2% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 23.3% |
| Marshallese | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 23.3% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 23.4% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 23.5% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 23.6% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 23.6% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 23.6% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 23.7% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 23.8% |
| Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 23.8% |
| German Russians | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 23.9% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 23.9% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 24.1% |