Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Choctaw Vision Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Choctaw
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Choctaw
2.1%
VISION DISABILITY
91.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
120th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.3%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
342nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Choctaw Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,800,208 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.531 and weighted average of 2.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 269,580,756 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.290 and weighted average of 3.3%, a difference of 57.9%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Choctaw |
Minimum | 0.59% | 0.24% |
Maximum | 6.8% | 15.8% |
Range | 6.2% | 15.5% |
Mean | 2.4% | 6.0% |
Median | 2.1% | 5.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.7% | 4.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.6% | 7.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.89% | 2.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.2% | 2.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.2% | 2.6% |
Similar Demographics by Vision Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are Immigrants from Uganda (2.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Philippines (2.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Scotland (2.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Ukraine (2.1%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Albania (2.1%, a difference of 0.13%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Kenyans | 92.5 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Croatians | 92.3 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 92.2 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Ugandans | 92.2 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Poles | 92.0 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 91.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 91.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 91.0 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 90.4 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 90.4 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Albania | 90.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Spain | 89.8 /100 | #124 | Excellent 2.1% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 89.8 /100 | #125 | Excellent 2.1% |
Immigrants | Peru | 89.5 /100 | #126 | Excellent 2.1% |
Sudanese | 89.2 /100 | #127 | Excellent 2.1% |
Demographics Similar to Choctaw by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Pima (3.3%, a difference of 1.1%), Pueblo (3.3%, a difference of 1.1%), Kiowa (3.3%, a difference of 1.4%), Lumbee (3.4%, a difference of 2.7%), and Creek (3.2%, a difference of 2.8%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 3.1% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 3.1% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 3.1% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 3.1% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 3.2% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 3.2% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 3.2% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 3.2% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 3.3% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 3.3% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 3.3% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 3.3% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 3.4% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 3.4% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 3.9% |