Immigrants from Vietnam vs Yugoslavian Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Vietnam
Yugoslavian
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Vietnam
Yugoslavians
8.7%
FAMILY POVERTY
75.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
154th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
83.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
142nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Vietnam vs Yugoslavian Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 403,957,519 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Vietnam and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.458 and weighted average of 8.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 285,303,830 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Yugoslavians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.001 and weighted average of 8.5%, a difference of 1.7%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Vietnam | Yugoslavian |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 2.1% |
| Maximum | 45.5% | 24.8% |
| Range | 44.1% | 22.7% |
| Mean | 9.4% | 7.7% |
| Median | 9.0% | 7.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.4% | 4.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.7% | 9.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.3% | 4.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.5% | 4.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.5% | 4.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Vietnam and Yugoslavians by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Vietnam are Immigrants from Kuwait (8.7%, a difference of 0.33%), Immigrants from Spain (8.6%, a difference of 0.72%), Immigrants from Oceania (8.7%, a difference of 0.74%), Samoan (8.6%, a difference of 0.86%), and Brazilian (8.6%, a difference of 0.94%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Yugoslavians are Immigrants from Germany (8.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Albanian (8.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (8.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Belarus (8.5%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Ukraine (8.5%, a difference of 0.11%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Armenians | 84.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 84.2 /100 | #139 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 84.1 /100 | #140 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 83.9 /100 | #141 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Yugoslavians | 83.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 83.3 /100 | #143 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Albanians | 83.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 83.2 /100 | #145 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 83.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 83.0 /100 | #147 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Scotch-Irish | 82.2 /100 | #148 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Mongolians | 80.4 /100 | #149 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Syrians | 80.3 /100 | #150 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Brazilians | 80.1 /100 | #151 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Samoans | 79.8 /100 | #152 | Good 8.6% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 79.1 /100 | #153 | Good 8.6% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 75.4 /100 | #154 | Good 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 73.6 /100 | #155 | Good 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 71.2 /100 | #156 | Good 8.7% |
| Tsimshian | 69.3 /100 | #157 | Good 8.8% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 69.1 /100 | #158 | Good 8.8% |