Immigrants from Uruguay vs Japanese Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Uruguay
Japanese
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Uruguay
Japanese
9.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
14.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
209th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.9%
FAMILY POVERTY
4.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
222nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Uruguay vs Japanese Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 133,161,280 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uruguay and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.122 and weighted average of 9.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 248,852,848 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Japanese and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.648 and weighted average of 9.9%, a difference of 3.6%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Uruguay | Japanese |
Minimum | 5.8% | 0.66% |
Maximum | 18.1% | 45.9% |
Range | 12.2% | 45.3% |
Mean | 10.3% | 14.7% |
Median | 9.7% | 11.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.5% | 9.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.0% | 16.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.5% | 7.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.4% | 9.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.3% | 9.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Uruguay and Japanese by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Uruguay are Immigrants from Eastern Africa (9.5%, a difference of 0.29%), Sierra Leonean (9.5%, a difference of 0.40%), Alsatian (9.6%, a difference of 0.73%), Immigrants from South America (9.5%, a difference of 0.93%), and Aleut (9.5%, a difference of 0.94%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Japanese are Immigrants from Cambodia (9.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Africa (9.9%, a difference of 0.30%), Bermudan (9.9%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Eritrea (9.9%, a difference of 0.36%), and Panamanian (9.8%, a difference of 0.49%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Aleuts | 18.0 /100 | #205 | Poor 9.5% |
Immigrants | South America | 18.0 /100 | #206 | Poor 9.5% |
Sierra Leoneans | 15.6 /100 | #207 | Poor 9.5% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 15.1 /100 | #208 | Poor 9.5% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 14.0 /100 | #209 | Poor 9.5% |
Alsatians | 11.3 /100 | #210 | Poor 9.6% |
Malaysians | 10.6 /100 | #211 | Poor 9.6% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 9.7 /100 | #212 | Tragic 9.7% |
Osage | 8.0 /100 | #213 | Tragic 9.7% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 6.7 /100 | #214 | Tragic 9.8% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 6.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 9.8% |
Moroccans | 6.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 9.8% |
Americans | 6.2 /100 | #217 | Tragic 9.8% |
Panamanians | 5.6 /100 | #218 | Tragic 9.8% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 5.4 /100 | #219 | Tragic 9.9% |
Bermudans | 5.3 /100 | #220 | Tragic 9.9% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 4.8 /100 | #221 | Tragic 9.9% |
Japanese | 4.8 /100 | #222 | Tragic 9.9% |
Immigrants | Africa | 4.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 9.9% |
Marshallese | 3.9 /100 | #224 | Tragic 9.9% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 3.6 /100 | #225 | Tragic 10.0% |