Immigrants from Uruguay vs Nonimmigrants Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Uruguay
Nonimmigrants
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Uruguay
Nonimmigrants
9.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
14.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
209th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
6.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
215th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Uruguay vs Nonimmigrants Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 133,161,280 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uruguay and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.122 and weighted average of 9.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 578,873,352 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Nonimmigrants and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.363 and weighted average of 9.8%, a difference of 2.5%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Uruguay | Nonimmigrants |
Minimum | 5.8% | 5.5% |
Maximum | 18.1% | 17.3% |
Range | 12.2% | 11.8% |
Mean | 10.3% | 10.5% |
Median | 9.7% | 10.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.5% | 8.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.0% | 11.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.5% | 3.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.4% | 2.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.3% | 2.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Uruguay and Nonimmigrants by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Uruguay are Immigrants from Eastern Africa (9.5%, a difference of 0.29%), Sierra Leonean (9.5%, a difference of 0.40%), Alsatian (9.6%, a difference of 0.73%), Immigrants from South America (9.5%, a difference of 0.93%), and Aleut (9.5%, a difference of 0.94%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Nonimmigrants are Immigrants from Micronesia (9.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Moroccan (9.8%, a difference of 0.060%), American (9.8%, a difference of 0.26%), Panamanian (9.8%, a difference of 0.58%), and Osage (9.7%, a difference of 0.61%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 19.6 /100 | #202 | Poor 9.4% |
German Russians | 19.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 9.4% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 18.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 9.4% |
Aleuts | 18.0 /100 | #205 | Poor 9.5% |
Immigrants | South America | 18.0 /100 | #206 | Poor 9.5% |
Sierra Leoneans | 15.6 /100 | #207 | Poor 9.5% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 15.1 /100 | #208 | Poor 9.5% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 14.0 /100 | #209 | Poor 9.5% |
Alsatians | 11.3 /100 | #210 | Poor 9.6% |
Malaysians | 10.6 /100 | #211 | Poor 9.6% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 9.7 /100 | #212 | Tragic 9.7% |
Osage | 8.0 /100 | #213 | Tragic 9.7% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 6.7 /100 | #214 | Tragic 9.8% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 6.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 9.8% |
Moroccans | 6.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 9.8% |
Americans | 6.2 /100 | #217 | Tragic 9.8% |
Panamanians | 5.6 /100 | #218 | Tragic 9.8% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 5.4 /100 | #219 | Tragic 9.9% |
Bermudans | 5.3 /100 | #220 | Tragic 9.9% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 4.8 /100 | #221 | Tragic 9.9% |
Japanese | 4.8 /100 | #222 | Tragic 9.9% |