Immigrants from Africa vs Japanese Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Africa
Japanese
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Africa
Japanese
9.9%
FAMILY POVERTY
4.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
223rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.9%
FAMILY POVERTY
4.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
222nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Africa vs Japanese Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 467,521,718 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Africa and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.577 and weighted average of 9.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 248,852,848 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Japanese and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.648 and weighted average of 9.9%, a difference of 0.30%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Africa | Japanese |
| Minimum | 2.2% | 0.66% |
| Maximum | 42.2% | 45.9% |
| Range | 40.0% | 45.3% |
| Mean | 13.1% | 14.7% |
| Median | 10.7% | 11.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.9% | 9.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.2% | 16.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.3% | 7.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.4% | 9.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.3% | 9.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Africa and Japanese by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Africa are Marshallese (9.9%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Cambodia (9.9%, a difference of 0.33%), Immigrants (10.0%, a difference of 0.55%), Bermudan (9.9%, a difference of 0.61%), and Immigrants from Eritrea (9.9%, a difference of 0.66%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Japanese are Immigrants from Cambodia (9.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Bermudan (9.9%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Eritrea (9.9%, a difference of 0.36%), Panamanian (9.8%, a difference of 0.49%), and Marshallese (9.9%, a difference of 0.60%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 9.7 /100 | #212 | Tragic 9.7% |
| Osage | 8.0 /100 | #213 | Tragic 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 6.7 /100 | #214 | Tragic 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 6.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 9.8% |
| Moroccans | 6.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 9.8% |
| Americans | 6.2 /100 | #217 | Tragic 9.8% |
| Panamanians | 5.6 /100 | #218 | Tragic 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 5.4 /100 | #219 | Tragic 9.9% |
| Bermudans | 5.3 /100 | #220 | Tragic 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 4.8 /100 | #221 | Tragic 9.9% |
| Japanese | 4.8 /100 | #222 | Tragic 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 4.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 9.9% |
| Marshallese | 3.9 /100 | #224 | Tragic 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 3.6 /100 | #225 | Tragic 10.0% |
| Ottawa | 3.3 /100 | #226 | Tragic 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 3.3 /100 | #227 | Tragic 10.0% |
| Sudanese | 3.1 /100 | #228 | Tragic 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 3.1 /100 | #229 | Tragic 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 3.1 /100 | #230 | Tragic 10.0% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 2.7 /100 | #231 | Tragic 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 2.3 /100 | #232 | Tragic 10.1% |