Immigrants from Uruguay vs Sudanese Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Uruguay
Sudanese
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Uruguay
Sudanese
9.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
14.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
209th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.0%
FAMILY POVERTY
3.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
228th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Uruguay vs Sudanese Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 133,161,280 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uruguay and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.122 and weighted average of 9.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 110,085,531 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Sudanese and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.527 and weighted average of 10.0%, a difference of 5.0%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Uruguay | Sudanese |
Minimum | 5.8% | 1.9% |
Maximum | 18.1% | 36.9% |
Range | 12.2% | 35.0% |
Mean | 10.3% | 11.5% |
Median | 9.7% | 9.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.5% | 7.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.0% | 13.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.5% | 5.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.4% | 7.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.3% | 7.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Uruguay and Sudanese by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Uruguay are Immigrants from Eastern Africa (9.5%, a difference of 0.29%), Alsatian (9.6%, a difference of 0.73%), Malaysian (9.6%, a difference of 0.97%), Immigrants from Thailand (9.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and Osage (9.7%, a difference of 1.9%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sudanese are Immigrants from Armenia (10.0%, a difference of 0.20%), Ottawa (10.0%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants (10.0%, a difference of 0.49%), Marshallese (9.9%, a difference of 0.74%), and Immigrants from Africa (9.9%, a difference of 1.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 15.1 /100 | #208 | Poor 9.5% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 14.0 /100 | #209 | Poor 9.5% |
Alsatians | 11.3 /100 | #210 | Poor 9.6% |
Malaysians | 10.6 /100 | #211 | Poor 9.6% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 9.7 /100 | #212 | Tragic 9.7% |
Osage | 8.0 /100 | #213 | Tragic 9.7% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 6.7 /100 | #214 | Tragic 9.8% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 6.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 9.8% |
Moroccans | 6.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 9.8% |
Americans | 6.2 /100 | #217 | Tragic 9.8% |
Panamanians | 5.6 /100 | #218 | Tragic 9.8% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 5.4 /100 | #219 | Tragic 9.9% |
Bermudans | 5.3 /100 | #220 | Tragic 9.9% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 4.8 /100 | #221 | Tragic 9.9% |
Japanese | 4.8 /100 | #222 | Tragic 9.9% |
Immigrants | Africa | 4.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 9.9% |
Marshallese | 3.9 /100 | #224 | Tragic 9.9% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 3.6 /100 | #225 | Tragic 10.0% |
Ottawa | 3.3 /100 | #226 | Tragic 10.0% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 3.3 /100 | #227 | Tragic 10.0% |
Sudanese | 3.1 /100 | #228 | Tragic 10.0% |