Immigrants from Spain vs White/Caucasian Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Spain
White/Caucasian
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Spain
Whites/Caucasians
8.6%
FAMILY POVERTY
79.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
153rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
69.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
158th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Spain vs White/Caucasian Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 239,325,125 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Spain and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.045 and weighted average of 8.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 578,762,373 people shows a very strong negative correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.883 and weighted average of 8.8%, a difference of 1.8%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Spain | White/Caucasian |
Minimum | 0.68% | 6.3% |
Maximum | 27.9% | 30.1% |
Range | 27.3% | 23.8% |
Mean | 7.9% | 12.0% |
Median | 7.5% | 11.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.0% | 7.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.8% | 14.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.8% | 6.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.7% | 4.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.7% | 4.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Spain and Whites/Caucasians by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Spain are Samoan (8.6%, a difference of 0.14%), Brazilian (8.6%, a difference of 0.22%), Mongolian (8.6%, a difference of 0.26%), Syrian (8.6%, a difference of 0.26%), and Scotch-Irish (8.6%, a difference of 0.67%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Whites/Caucasians are Tsimshian (8.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Peruvian (8.8%, a difference of 0.16%), Hungarian (8.8%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (8.8%, a difference of 0.33%), and Immigrants from Oceania (8.7%, a difference of 0.34%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 83.2 /100 | #145 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 83.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 83.0 /100 | #147 | Excellent 8.5% |
Scotch-Irish | 82.2 /100 | #148 | Excellent 8.6% |
Mongolians | 80.4 /100 | #149 | Excellent 8.6% |
Syrians | 80.3 /100 | #150 | Excellent 8.6% |
Brazilians | 80.1 /100 | #151 | Excellent 8.6% |
Samoans | 79.8 /100 | #152 | Good 8.6% |
Immigrants | Spain | 79.1 /100 | #153 | Good 8.6% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 75.4 /100 | #154 | Good 8.7% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 73.6 /100 | #155 | Good 8.7% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 71.2 /100 | #156 | Good 8.7% |
Tsimshian | 69.3 /100 | #157 | Good 8.8% |
Whites/Caucasians | 69.1 /100 | #158 | Good 8.8% |
Peruvians | 68.0 /100 | #159 | Good 8.8% |
Hungarians | 67.2 /100 | #160 | Good 8.8% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 66.9 /100 | #161 | Good 8.8% |
Ethiopians | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 8.8% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 66.0 /100 | #163 | Good 8.8% |
Celtics | 64.9 /100 | #164 | Good 8.8% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 64.7 /100 | #165 | Good 8.8% |