Immigrants from Southern Europe vs White/Caucasian Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Southern Europe
White/Caucasian
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Southern Europe
Whites/Caucasians
8.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
86.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
137th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
69.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
158th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Southern Europe vs White/Caucasian Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 401,468,990 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Southern Europe and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.628 and weighted average of 8.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 578,762,373 people shows a very strong negative correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.883 and weighted average of 8.8%, a difference of 3.5%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Southern Europe | White/Caucasian |
Minimum | 4.4% | 6.3% |
Maximum | 20.5% | 30.1% |
Range | 16.1% | 23.8% |
Mean | 10.2% | 12.0% |
Median | 8.8% | 11.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.8% | 7.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.5% | 14.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.7% | 6.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.8% | 4.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.7% | 4.6% |
Similar Demographics by Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Southern Europe by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Southern Europe are Immigrants from Brazil (8.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Malaysia (8.5%, a difference of 0.12%), Chilean (8.5%, a difference of 0.16%), Sri Lankan (8.5%, a difference of 0.17%), and Armenian (8.5%, a difference of 0.40%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 88.6 /100 | #130 | Excellent 8.4% |
Puget Sound Salish | 88.6 /100 | #131 | Excellent 8.4% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 88.2 /100 | #132 | Excellent 8.4% |
Sri Lankans | 86.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 8.5% |
Chileans | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 86.5 /100 | #135 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 86.3 /100 | #136 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 86.0 /100 | #137 | Excellent 8.5% |
Armenians | 84.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 84.2 /100 | #139 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 84.1 /100 | #140 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 83.9 /100 | #141 | Excellent 8.5% |
Yugoslavians | 83.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Germany | 83.3 /100 | #143 | Excellent 8.5% |
Albanians | 83.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 8.5% |
Demographics Similar to Whites/Caucasians by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Whites/Caucasians are Tsimshian (8.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Peruvian (8.8%, a difference of 0.16%), Hungarian (8.8%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (8.8%, a difference of 0.33%), and Immigrants from Oceania (8.7%, a difference of 0.34%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Brazilians | 80.1 /100 | #151 | Excellent 8.6% |
Samoans | 79.8 /100 | #152 | Good 8.6% |
Immigrants | Spain | 79.1 /100 | #153 | Good 8.6% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 75.4 /100 | #154 | Good 8.7% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 73.6 /100 | #155 | Good 8.7% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 71.2 /100 | #156 | Good 8.7% |
Tsimshian | 69.3 /100 | #157 | Good 8.8% |
Whites/Caucasians | 69.1 /100 | #158 | Good 8.8% |
Peruvians | 68.0 /100 | #159 | Good 8.8% |
Hungarians | 67.2 /100 | #160 | Good 8.8% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 66.9 /100 | #161 | Good 8.8% |
Ethiopians | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 8.8% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 66.0 /100 | #163 | Good 8.8% |
Celtics | 64.9 /100 | #164 | Good 8.8% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 64.7 /100 | #165 | Good 8.8% |