Immigrants from Norway vs White/Caucasian Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Norway
White/Caucasian
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Norway
Whites/Caucasians
8.1%
FAMILY POVERTY
95.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
101st/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
69.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
158th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Norway vs White/Caucasian Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 116,627,868 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Norway and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.129 and weighted average of 8.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 578,762,373 people shows a very strong negative correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.883 and weighted average of 8.8%, a difference of 8.4%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Norway | White/Caucasian |
Minimum | 0.43% | 6.3% |
Maximum | 20.0% | 30.1% |
Range | 19.6% | 23.8% |
Mean | 5.6% | 12.0% |
Median | 5.3% | 11.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.9% | 7.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.2% | 14.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.3% | 6.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.0% | 4.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.9% | 4.6% |
Similar Demographics by Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Norway by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Norway are Immigrants from Indonesia (8.1%, a difference of 0.010%), New Zealander (8.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Welsh (8.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Eastern Europe (8.1%, a difference of 0.10%), and Slavic (8.1%, a difference of 0.11%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 96.6 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 96.5 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 96.5 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 96.1 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 95.9 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Welsh | 95.8 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 8.1% |
New Zealanders | 95.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Immigrants | Norway | 95.7 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.7 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 95.6 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Slavs | 95.6 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Laotians | 95.6 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Egyptians | 95.1 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 8.1% |
French Canadians | 95.0 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Basques | 94.9 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Demographics Similar to Whites/Caucasians by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Whites/Caucasians are Tsimshian (8.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Peruvian (8.8%, a difference of 0.16%), Hungarian (8.8%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (8.8%, a difference of 0.33%), and Immigrants from Oceania (8.7%, a difference of 0.34%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Brazilians | 80.1 /100 | #151 | Excellent 8.6% |
Samoans | 79.8 /100 | #152 | Good 8.6% |
Immigrants | Spain | 79.1 /100 | #153 | Good 8.6% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 75.4 /100 | #154 | Good 8.7% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 73.6 /100 | #155 | Good 8.7% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 71.2 /100 | #156 | Good 8.7% |
Tsimshian | 69.3 /100 | #157 | Good 8.8% |
Whites/Caucasians | 69.1 /100 | #158 | Good 8.8% |
Peruvians | 68.0 /100 | #159 | Good 8.8% |
Hungarians | 67.2 /100 | #160 | Good 8.8% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 66.9 /100 | #161 | Good 8.8% |
Ethiopians | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 8.8% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 66.0 /100 | #163 | Good 8.8% |
Celtics | 64.9 /100 | #164 | Good 8.8% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 64.7 /100 | #165 | Good 8.8% |