Immigrants from Spain vs Samoan Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Spain
Samoan
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Spain
Samoans
8.6%
FAMILY POVERTY
79.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
153rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.6%
FAMILY POVERTY
79.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
152nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Spain vs Samoan Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 239,325,125 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Spain and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.045 and weighted average of 8.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,914,322 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Samoans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.121 and weighted average of 8.6%, a difference of 0.14%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Spain | Samoan |
Minimum | 0.68% | 0.54% |
Maximum | 27.9% | 29.9% |
Range | 27.3% | 29.4% |
Mean | 7.9% | 8.8% |
Median | 7.5% | 8.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.0% | 5.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.8% | 10.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.8% | 4.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.7% | 5.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.7% | 5.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Spain and Samoans by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Spain are Brazilian (8.6%, a difference of 0.22%), Mongolian (8.6%, a difference of 0.26%), Syrian (8.6%, a difference of 0.26%), Scotch-Irish (8.6%, a difference of 0.67%), and Immigrants from Vietnam (8.7%, a difference of 0.72%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Samoans are Brazilian (8.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Mongolian (8.6%, a difference of 0.13%), Syrian (8.6%, a difference of 0.13%), Scotch-Irish (8.6%, a difference of 0.54%), and Immigrants from Jordan (8.5%, a difference of 0.74%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Yugoslavians | 83.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Germany | 83.3 /100 | #143 | Excellent 8.5% |
Albanians | 83.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 83.2 /100 | #145 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 83.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 83.0 /100 | #147 | Excellent 8.5% |
Scotch-Irish | 82.2 /100 | #148 | Excellent 8.6% |
Mongolians | 80.4 /100 | #149 | Excellent 8.6% |
Syrians | 80.3 /100 | #150 | Excellent 8.6% |
Brazilians | 80.1 /100 | #151 | Excellent 8.6% |
Samoans | 79.8 /100 | #152 | Good 8.6% |
Immigrants | Spain | 79.1 /100 | #153 | Good 8.6% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 75.4 /100 | #154 | Good 8.7% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 73.6 /100 | #155 | Good 8.7% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 71.2 /100 | #156 | Good 8.7% |
Tsimshian | 69.3 /100 | #157 | Good 8.8% |
Whites/Caucasians | 69.1 /100 | #158 | Good 8.8% |
Peruvians | 68.0 /100 | #159 | Good 8.8% |
Hungarians | 67.2 /100 | #160 | Good 8.8% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 66.9 /100 | #161 | Good 8.8% |
Ethiopians | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 8.8% |