Blackfeet vs British West Indian Male Poverty
COMPARE
Blackfeet
British West Indian
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Blackfeet
British West Indians
14.0%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
298th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.6%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
316th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Blackfeet vs British West Indian Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 309,436,017 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Blackfeet and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.556 and weighted average of 14.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 152,618,428 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of British West Indians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.120 and weighted average of 14.6%, a difference of 4.3%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Blackfeet | British West Indian |
Minimum | 3.9% | 0.21% |
Maximum | 65.7% | 30.9% |
Range | 61.8% | 30.7% |
Mean | 23.9% | 12.5% |
Median | 17.9% | 12.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.4% | 8.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 31.9% | 15.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.5% | 6.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.2% | 5.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.0% | 5.5% |
Demographics Similar to Blackfeet and British West Indians by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Blackfeet are Inupiat (14.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Guatemala (14.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Mexico (14.0%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Senegal (14.0%, a difference of 0.29%), and Immigrants from Caribbean (14.0%, a difference of 0.34%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to British West Indians are Chippewa (14.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Honduras (14.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Somalia (14.6%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Dominica (14.7%, a difference of 0.68%), and Choctaw (14.4%, a difference of 1.5%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 14.0% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 14.0% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 14.0% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 14.0% |
Immigrants | Senegal | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 14.0% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 14.0% |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 14.1% |
Senegalese | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 14.1% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 14.1% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 14.1% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 14.2% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 14.2% |
Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 14.3% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 14.3% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 14.3% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 14.6% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 14.6% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 14.6% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 14.6% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 14.7% |