Immigrants from Pakistan vs Chippewa Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Pakistan
Chippewa
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Pakistan
Chippewa
8.0%
FAMILY POVERTY
96.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
94th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.2%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
277th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Pakistan vs Chippewa Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 283,475,243 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Pakistan and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.252 and weighted average of 8.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,735,331 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.554 and weighted average of 11.2%, a difference of 40.1%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Pakistan | Chippewa |
Minimum | 1.4% | 4.7% |
Maximum | 21.0% | 70.6% |
Range | 19.6% | 65.9% |
Mean | 7.8% | 19.0% |
Median | 7.4% | 14.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.9% | 10.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.2% | 26.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.3% | 16.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.3% | 12.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.3% | 12.7% |
Similar Demographics by Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Pakistan by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Pakistan are Immigrants from Philippines (8.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Turkey (8.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Tlingit-Haida (8.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Czechoslovakian (8.0%, a difference of 0.29%), and Immigrants from Switzerland (8.1%, a difference of 0.44%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Belgians | 97.3 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Serbians | 97.2 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 97.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | England | 97.1 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Italy | 97.0 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Czechoslovakians | 96.8 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Tlingit-Haida | 96.7 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 96.6 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 96.5 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 96.5 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 96.1 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 95.9 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Welsh | 95.8 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 8.1% |
New Zealanders | 95.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Immigrants | Norway | 95.7 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Guyanese (11.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Guyana (11.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Central American (11.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Spanish American (11.2%, a difference of 0.16%), and Blackfeet (11.3%, a difference of 0.16%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 11.1% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 11.1% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 11.2% |
Somalis | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 11.2% |
Spanish Americans | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 11.2% |
Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 11.2% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #276 | Tragic 11.2% |
Chippewa | 0.1 /100 | #277 | Tragic 11.2% |
Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #278 | Tragic 11.2% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 11.3% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 11.3% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 11.3% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 11.3% |
Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 11.3% |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 11.3% |