Immigrants from Argentina vs Chippewa Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Argentina
Chippewa
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Argentina
Chippewa
8.4%
FAMILY POVERTY
88.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
132nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.2%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
277th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Argentina vs Chippewa Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 264,069,938 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Argentina and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.182 and weighted average of 8.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,735,331 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.554 and weighted average of 11.2%, a difference of 33.6%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Argentina | Chippewa |
Minimum | 2.3% | 4.7% |
Maximum | 26.5% | 70.6% |
Range | 24.3% | 65.9% |
Mean | 8.9% | 19.0% |
Median | 8.1% | 14.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.6% | 10.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.1% | 26.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.5% | 16.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.3% | 12.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.2% | 12.7% |
Similar Demographics by Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Argentina by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Argentina are Puget Sound Salish (8.4%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (8.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Portuguese (8.4%, a difference of 0.34%), Argentinean (8.4%, a difference of 0.49%), and Sri Lankan (8.5%, a difference of 0.50%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Pakistanis | 90.8 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Icelanders | 90.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 89.9 /100 | #127 | Excellent 8.4% |
Argentineans | 89.6 /100 | #128 | Excellent 8.4% |
Portuguese | 89.2 /100 | #129 | Excellent 8.4% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 88.6 /100 | #130 | Excellent 8.4% |
Puget Sound Salish | 88.6 /100 | #131 | Excellent 8.4% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 88.2 /100 | #132 | Excellent 8.4% |
Sri Lankans | 86.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 8.5% |
Chileans | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 86.5 /100 | #135 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 86.3 /100 | #136 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 86.0 /100 | #137 | Excellent 8.5% |
Armenians | 84.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 84.2 /100 | #139 | Excellent 8.5% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Guyanese (11.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Guyana (11.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Central American (11.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Spanish American (11.2%, a difference of 0.16%), and Blackfeet (11.3%, a difference of 0.16%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 11.1% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 11.1% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 11.2% |
Somalis | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 11.2% |
Spanish Americans | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 11.2% |
Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 11.2% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #276 | Tragic 11.2% |
Chippewa | 0.1 /100 | #277 | Tragic 11.2% |
Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #278 | Tragic 11.2% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 11.3% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 11.3% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 11.3% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 11.3% |
Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 11.3% |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 11.3% |