Immigrants from Norway vs Czechoslovakian Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Norway
Czechoslovakian
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Norway
Czechoslovakians
8.1%
FAMILY POVERTY
95.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
101st/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.0%
FAMILY POVERTY
96.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
92nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Norway vs Czechoslovakian Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 116,627,868 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Norway and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.129 and weighted average of 8.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 367,669,162 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.429 and weighted average of 8.0%, a difference of 1.1%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Norway | Czechoslovakian |
| Minimum | 0.43% | 1.1% |
| Maximum | 20.0% | 23.0% |
| Range | 19.6% | 21.9% |
| Mean | 5.6% | 9.4% |
| Median | 5.3% | 7.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.9% | 6.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.2% | 12.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.3% | 5.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.0% | 5.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.9% | 5.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Norway and Czechoslovakians by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Norway are Immigrants from Indonesia (8.1%, a difference of 0.010%), New Zealander (8.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Welsh (8.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Eastern Europe (8.1%, a difference of 0.10%), and Slavic (8.1%, a difference of 0.11%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Tlingit-Haida (8.0%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Italy (8.0%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Pakistan (8.0%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Philippines (8.0%, a difference of 0.30%), and Immigrants from Turkey (8.0%, a difference of 0.32%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Scottish | 97.3 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Belgians | 97.3 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Serbians | 97.2 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 97.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | England | 97.1 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 97.0 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Czechoslovakians | 96.8 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 96.7 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 96.6 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 96.5 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 96.5 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 96.1 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 95.9 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Welsh | 95.8 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| New Zealanders | 95.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 95.7 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.7 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 95.6 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Slavs | 95.6 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Laotians | 95.6 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Egyptians | 95.1 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 8.1% |