Egyptian vs Czechoslovakian Family Poverty
COMPARE
Egyptian
Czechoslovakian
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Egyptians
Czechoslovakians
8.1%
FAMILY POVERTY
95.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
106th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.0%
FAMILY POVERTY
96.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
92nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Egyptian vs Czechoslovakian Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 276,431,848 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Egyptians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.554 and weighted average of 8.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 367,669,162 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.429 and weighted average of 8.0%, a difference of 1.7%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Egyptian | Czechoslovakian |
Minimum | 0.78% | 1.1% |
Maximum | 66.7% | 23.0% |
Range | 65.9% | 21.9% |
Mean | 9.5% | 9.4% |
Median | 7.2% | 7.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.4% | 6.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.6% | 12.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.3% | 5.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.5% | 5.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.4% | 5.2% |
Demographics Similar to Egyptians and Czechoslovakians by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Egyptians are French Canadian (8.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Basque (8.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Jordanian (8.2%, a difference of 0.22%), Laotian (8.1%, a difference of 0.41%), and Slavic (8.1%, a difference of 0.44%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Tlingit-Haida (8.0%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Italy (8.0%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Pakistan (8.0%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Philippines (8.0%, a difference of 0.30%), and Immigrants from Turkey (8.0%, a difference of 0.32%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Denmark | 97.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | England | 97.1 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Italy | 97.0 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Czechoslovakians | 96.8 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Tlingit-Haida | 96.7 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 96.6 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 96.5 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 96.5 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 96.1 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 95.9 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Welsh | 95.8 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 8.1% |
New Zealanders | 95.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Immigrants | Norway | 95.7 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.7 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 95.6 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Slavs | 95.6 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Laotians | 95.6 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Egyptians | 95.1 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 8.1% |
French Canadians | 95.0 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Basques | 94.9 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Jordanians | 94.8 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 8.2% |