English vs Czechoslovakian Family Poverty
COMPARE
English
Czechoslovakian
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
English
Czechoslovakians
7.9%
FAMILY POVERTY
97.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
80th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.0%
FAMILY POVERTY
96.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
92nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
English vs Czechoslovakian Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 573,938,644 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of English and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.562 and weighted average of 7.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 367,669,162 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.429 and weighted average of 8.0%, a difference of 1.5%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | English | Czechoslovakian |
Minimum | 3.4% | 1.1% |
Maximum | 75.3% | 23.0% |
Range | 71.9% | 21.9% |
Mean | 14.1% | 9.4% |
Median | 8.6% | 7.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.2% | 6.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.3% | 12.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.2% | 5.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.9% | 5.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.9% | 5.2% |
Demographics Similar to English and Czechoslovakians by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to English are Irish (7.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Poland (7.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Europe (7.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from North America (7.9%, a difference of 0.14%), and Slovak (7.9%, a difference of 0.21%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Tlingit-Haida (8.0%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Italy (8.0%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Pakistan (8.0%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Philippines (8.0%, a difference of 0.30%), and Immigrants from Turkey (8.0%, a difference of 0.32%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Latvia | 98.0 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Ukrainians | 98.0 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Immigrants | North America | 97.9 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Immigrants | Europe | 97.8 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 7.9% |
English | 97.8 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Irish | 97.8 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Immigrants | Poland | 97.8 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Slovaks | 97.7 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 7.9% |
British | 97.5 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Immigrants | Asia | 97.4 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Scottish | 97.3 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Belgians | 97.3 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Serbians | 97.2 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 97.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | England | 97.1 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Italy | 97.0 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Czechoslovakians | 96.8 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Tlingit-Haida | 96.7 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 96.6 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 96.5 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 96.5 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 8.0% |