Immigrants from Ireland vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Ireland
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Ireland
Immigrants from Hong Kong
10.1%
POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
5th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.4%
POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
13th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Ireland vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 240,745,110 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ireland and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.019 and weighted average of 10.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,892,762 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.117 and weighted average of 10.4%, a difference of 3.2%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Ireland | Immigrants from Hong Kong |
Minimum | 0.31% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 22.3% | 16.6% |
Range | 22.0% | 15.1% |
Mean | 8.3% | 8.8% |
Median | 8.1% | 8.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.1% | 6.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.7% | 10.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.6% | 3.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.3% | 3.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.3% | 3.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Ireland and Immigrants from Hong Kong by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ireland are Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (10.1%, a difference of 0.18%), Filipino (10.1%, a difference of 0.32%), Maltese (10.2%, a difference of 0.74%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (10.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and Bulgarian (10.2%, a difference of 1.6%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong are Bhutanese (10.4%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Bolivia (10.4%, a difference of 0.31%), Bolivian (10.4%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Lithuania (10.3%, a difference of 0.57%), and Lithuanian (10.5%, a difference of 0.62%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 9.0% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 10.6% |