Immigrants from Ireland vs Chinese Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Ireland
Chinese
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Ireland
Chinese
11.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
6th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Ireland vs Chinese Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 240,733,190 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ireland and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.083 and weighted average of 11.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,802,428 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.064 and weighted average of 10.4%, a difference of 5.8%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Ireland | Chinese |
Minimum | 0.42% | 3.4% |
Maximum | 29.3% | 25.9% |
Range | 28.9% | 22.5% |
Mean | 8.7% | 10.8% |
Median | 8.8% | 10.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.6% | 6.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.9% | 13.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.3% | 6.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.8% | 5.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.8% | 5.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Ireland and Chinese by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ireland are Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (11.0%, a difference of 0.37%), Filipino (10.9%, a difference of 0.38%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (11.1%, a difference of 1.1%), Bulgarian (11.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and Immigrants from Hong Kong (11.2%, a difference of 2.1%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Thai (10.5%, a difference of 0.65%), Immigrants from Taiwan (10.5%, a difference of 1.4%), Immigrants from India (9.9%, a difference of 5.2%), Filipino (10.9%, a difference of 5.4%), and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (11.0%, a difference of 6.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 9.9% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.5% |