Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Indian (Asian) Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Indian (Asian)
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Indians (Asian)
16.5%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
3rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.9%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
15th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Indian (Asian) Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 250,865,263 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.338 and weighted average of 16.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 483,253,971 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.190 and weighted average of 17.9%, a difference of 8.6%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Hong Kong | Indian (Asian) |
Minimum | 2.9% | 4.6% |
Maximum | 30.8% | 26.6% |
Range | 27.8% | 21.9% |
Mean | 14.5% | 15.3% |
Median | 14.1% | 15.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.3% | 12.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.7% | 18.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.3% | 6.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.6% | 4.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.6% | 4.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong and Indians (Asian) by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong are Immigrants from Taiwan (16.4%, a difference of 1.1%), Immigrants from India (16.8%, a difference of 1.7%), Chinese (16.1%, a difference of 2.4%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (17.0%, a difference of 2.6%), and Filipino (17.0%, a difference of 2.8%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Indians (Asian) are Bolivian (17.9%, a difference of 0.15%), Iranian (18.0%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Bolivia (17.8%, a difference of 0.59%), Immigrants from Korea (18.1%, a difference of 0.76%), and Immigrants from South Central Asia (17.8%, a difference of 0.85%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 16.1% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 16.4% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 16.5% |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 16.8% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 17.3% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 17.5% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 17.7% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 17.9% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 17.9% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 18.0% |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 18.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 18.1% |
Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 18.1% |
Immigrants | Greece | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 18.3% |