Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Indian (Asian) Female Unemployment
COMPARE
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Indian (Asian)
Female Unemployment
Female Unemployment Comparison
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Indians (Asian)
5.1%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
84.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
133rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.1%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
84.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
136th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Indian (Asian) Female Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,623,871 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.041 and weighted average of 5.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 491,024,006 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.104 and weighted average of 5.1%, a difference of 0.070%.
Female Unemployment Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Hong Kong | Indian (Asian) |
Minimum | 0.90% | 2.9% |
Maximum | 13.8% | 7.6% |
Range | 12.9% | 4.8% |
Mean | 5.0% | 5.0% |
Median | 4.9% | 4.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.3% | 4.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.6% | 5.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.3% | 0.98% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.6% | 0.84% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.6% | 0.84% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong and Indians (Asian) by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong are Immigrants from Sri Lanka (5.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Eritrea (5.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Latvia (5.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (5.1%, a difference of 0.070%), and Maltese (5.1%, a difference of 0.090%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Indians (Asian) are Pakistani (5.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Eritrea (5.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Latvia (5.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (5.1%, a difference of 0.090%), and Chickasaw (5.1%, a difference of 0.11%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
Immigrants | Europe | 87.2 /100 | #124 | Excellent 5.1% |
Basques | 86.5 /100 | #125 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Korea | 86.3 /100 | #126 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 86.0 /100 | #127 | Excellent 5.1% |
Chileans | 85.8 /100 | #128 | Excellent 5.1% |
Ethiopians | 85.7 /100 | #129 | Excellent 5.1% |
Maltese | 85.5 /100 | #130 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 85.4 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 85.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 84.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 84.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 84.6 /100 | #135 | Excellent 5.1% |
Indians (Asian) | 84.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 5.1% |
Pakistanis | 83.8 /100 | #137 | Excellent 5.1% |
Chickasaw | 83.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 83.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | France | 82.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 81.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 5.1% |
Palestinians | 80.8 /100 | #142 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 80.7 /100 | #143 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 80.4 /100 | #144 | Excellent 5.1% |