Bhutanese vs Indian (Asian) Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Bhutanese
Indian (Asian)
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Bhutanese
Indians (Asian)
17.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
9th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.9%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
15th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bhutanese vs Indian (Asian) Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 446,564,428 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.334 and weighted average of 17.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 483,253,971 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.190 and weighted average of 17.9%, a difference of 1.4%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bhutanese | Indian (Asian) |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 4.6% |
| Maximum | 41.4% | 26.6% |
| Range | 40.1% | 21.9% |
| Mean | 15.9% | 15.3% |
| Median | 15.1% | 15.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.2% | 12.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.9% | 18.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.7% | 6.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.8% | 4.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.8% | 4.6% |
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese and Indians (Asian) by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Immigrants from Ireland (17.8%, a difference of 0.41%), Immigrants from Lithuania (17.8%, a difference of 0.50%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (17.8%, a difference of 0.56%), Immigrants from Bolivia (17.8%, a difference of 0.82%), and Bolivian (17.9%, a difference of 1.3%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Indians (Asian) are Bolivian (17.9%, a difference of 0.15%), Iranian (18.0%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Bolivia (17.8%, a difference of 0.59%), Immigrants from Korea (18.1%, a difference of 0.76%), and Immigrants from South Central Asia (17.8%, a difference of 0.85%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 16.4% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 16.5% |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 16.8% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 17.3% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 17.5% |
| Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 17.7% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 17.9% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 17.9% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 18.0% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 18.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 18.1% |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 18.1% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 18.3% |