Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Romanian Married-Couple Family Poverty

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 252,495,550 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.070 and weighted average of 4.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 374,441,854 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Romanians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.447 and weighted average of 4.8%, a difference of 2.5%.

Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Hong Kong	Romanian
Minimum	0.53%	1.9%
Maximum	11.4%	55.6%
Range	10.8%	53.6%
Mean	4.6%	13.3%
Median	4.1%	6.8%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	3.1%	4.2%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	5.3%	13.9%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	2.2%	9.6%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	2.2%	15.4%
Standard Deviation (Population)	2.1%	15.1%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong and Romanians by Married-Couple Family Poverty

In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong are Immigrants from Bolivia (4.7%, a difference of 0.16%), Laotian (4.7%, a difference of 0.20%), Pakistani (4.7%, a difference of 0.20%), Tongan (4.7%, a difference of 0.38%), and Immigrants from Nepal (4.7%, a difference of 0.45%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Romanians are Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (4.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Asia (4.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Jordanian (4.8%, a difference of 0.27%), White/Caucasian (4.8%, a difference of 0.29%), and Indian (Asian) (4.8%, a difference of 0.33%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Married-Couple Family Poverty
Immigrants \| France	96.9 /100 \| #106	Exceptional 4.7%
Immigrants \| Germany	96.8 /100 \| #107	Exceptional 4.7%
Laotians	96.6 /100 \| #108	Exceptional 4.7%
Immigrants \| Hong Kong	96.4 /100 \| #109	Exceptional 4.7%
Immigrants \| Bolivia	96.2 /100 \| #110	Exceptional 4.7%
Pakistanis	96.2 /100 \| #111	Exceptional 4.7%
Tongans	95.9 /100 \| #112	Exceptional 4.7%
Immigrants \| Nepal	95.9 /100 \| #113	Exceptional 4.7%
Immigrants \| Indonesia	95.1 /100 \| #114	Exceptional 4.8%
Taiwanese	94.8 /100 \| #115	Exceptional 4.8%
Celtics	94.8 /100 \| #116	Exceptional 4.8%
Kenyans	94.7 /100 \| #117	Exceptional 4.8%
Immigrants \| Philippines	94.6 /100 \| #118	Exceptional 4.8%
Immigrants \| Eastern Asia	94.0 /100 \| #119	Exceptional 4.8%
Immigrants \| Southern Europe	93.4 /100 \| #120	Exceptional 4.8%
Indians (Asian)	93.2 /100 \| #121	Exceptional 4.8%
Whites/Caucasians	93.1 /100 \| #122	Exceptional 4.8%
Jordanians	93.1 /100 \| #123	Exceptional 4.8%
Romanians	92.5 /100 \| #124	Exceptional 4.8%
Immigrants \| Bosnia and Herzegovina	92.5 /100 \| #125	Exceptional 4.8%
Immigrants \| Asia	92.3 /100 \| #126	Exceptional 4.8%