Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Egyptian Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Egyptian
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Egyptians
4.7%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
96.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
109th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.8%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
92.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
127th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Egyptian Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 252,495,550 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.070 and weighted average of 4.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 275,471,686 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Egyptians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.422 and weighted average of 4.8%, a difference of 2.7%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Hong Kong | Egyptian |
Minimum | 0.53% | 0.67% |
Maximum | 11.4% | 28.0% |
Range | 10.8% | 27.3% |
Mean | 4.6% | 6.4% |
Median | 4.1% | 4.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.1% | 3.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.3% | 6.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.2% | 3.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.2% | 5.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.1% | 5.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong and Egyptians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong are Immigrants from Bolivia (4.7%, a difference of 0.16%), Laotian (4.7%, a difference of 0.20%), Pakistani (4.7%, a difference of 0.20%), Tongan (4.7%, a difference of 0.38%), and Immigrants from Nepal (4.7%, a difference of 0.45%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Egyptians are Immigrants from Asia (4.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (4.8%, a difference of 0.21%), Romanian (4.8%, a difference of 0.23%), Palestinian (4.9%, a difference of 0.32%), and Jordanian (4.8%, a difference of 0.50%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Laotians | 96.6 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 96.4 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 96.2 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Pakistanis | 96.2 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Tongans | 95.9 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 95.9 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.1 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Taiwanese | 94.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Celtics | 94.8 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Kenyans | 94.7 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 94.6 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 94.0 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 93.4 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Indians (Asian) | 93.2 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Whites/Caucasians | 93.1 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Jordanians | 93.1 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Romanians | 92.5 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 92.5 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants | Asia | 92.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Egyptians | 92.0 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Palestinians | 91.2 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 4.9% |