Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Indian (Asian) Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Indian (Asian)
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Indians (Asian)
11.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
45th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
97.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
65th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Indian (Asian) Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,448,057 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.178 and weighted average of 11.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 494,574,283 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.030 and weighted average of 12.2%, a difference of 2.5%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Indian (Asian) |
| Minimum | 2.0% | 2.4% |
| Maximum | 34.9% | 21.9% |
| Range | 32.8% | 19.5% |
| Mean | 10.7% | 11.0% |
| Median | 9.3% | 10.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.0% | 8.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.2% | 12.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.2% | 3.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.2% | 3.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.1% | 3.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Indians (Asian) by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia are Turkish (11.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Asian (11.9%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Japan (11.9%, a difference of 0.45%), Immigrants from Romania (12.0%, a difference of 0.64%), and Slovene (12.0%, a difference of 0.65%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Indians (Asian) are German (12.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Ukrainian (12.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Italy (12.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Asia (12.2%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Australia (12.2%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.2 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Turks | 99.2 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Asians | 99.1 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 99.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Slovenes | 98.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.9 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 98.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 98.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 98.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 98.5 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Estonians | 98.3 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 98.3 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Scandinavians | 98.2 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 98.2 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 98.1 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 98.1 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 98.0 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Ukrainians | 98.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Germans | 98.0 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Indians (Asian) | 97.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 12.2% |