Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Italy Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Immigrants from Italy
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Immigrants from Italy
11.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
45th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
98.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
62nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Italy Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,448,057 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.178 and weighted average of 11.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 324,078,093 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Italy and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.195 and weighted average of 12.2%, a difference of 2.4%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Immigrants from Italy |
Minimum | 2.0% | 4.5% |
Maximum | 34.9% | 23.1% |
Range | 32.8% | 18.5% |
Mean | 10.7% | 9.3% |
Median | 9.3% | 8.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.0% | 6.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.2% | 11.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.2% | 5.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.2% | 4.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.1% | 4.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Italy by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia are Turkish (11.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Tongan (11.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Korean (11.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Asian (11.9%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Japan (11.9%, a difference of 0.45%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Italy are Immigrants from Asia (12.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Australia (12.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Ukrainian (12.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Europe (12.1%, a difference of 0.27%), and Scandinavian (12.1%, a difference of 0.28%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Koreans | 99.2 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Tongans | 99.2 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.2 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Turks | 99.2 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Asians | 99.1 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Romania | 99.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Slovenes | 98.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.9 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 98.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Austria | 98.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 98.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 98.5 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Estonians | 98.3 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 98.3 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Scandinavians | 98.2 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Europe | 98.2 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Australia | 98.1 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Asia | 98.1 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Italy | 98.0 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Ukrainians | 98.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 12.2% |