Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Sri Lanka Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Immigrants from Sri Lanka
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Immigrants from Sri Lanka
11.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
45th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.1%
FEMALE POVERTY
98.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
55th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Sri Lanka Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,448,057 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.178 and weighted average of 11.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 149,673,263 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sri Lanka and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.210 and weighted average of 12.1%, a difference of 1.7%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Immigrants from Sri Lanka |
Minimum | 2.0% | 1.4% |
Maximum | 34.9% | 21.1% |
Range | 32.8% | 19.7% |
Mean | 10.7% | 10.3% |
Median | 9.3% | 10.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.0% | 6.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.2% | 13.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.2% | 6.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.2% | 4.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.1% | 4.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Sri Lanka by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia are Turkish (11.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Tongan (11.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Korean (11.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Czech (11.9%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Moldova (11.9%, a difference of 0.20%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Sri Lanka are Estonian (12.1%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Serbia (12.1%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Philippines (12.1%, a difference of 0.35%), Scandinavian (12.1%, a difference of 0.39%), and Immigrants from Europe (12.1%, a difference of 0.40%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Macedonians | 99.3 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Czechs | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 99.2 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Koreans | 99.2 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Tongans | 99.2 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.2 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Turks | 99.2 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Asians | 99.1 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Romania | 99.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Slovenes | 98.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.9 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 98.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Austria | 98.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 98.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 98.5 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Estonians | 98.3 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 98.3 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Scandinavians | 98.2 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Europe | 98.2 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Australia | 98.1 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 12.2% |