Immigrants from Japan vs Immigrants from Sri Lanka Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Japan
Immigrants from Sri Lanka
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Japan
Immigrants from Sri Lanka
11.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
48th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.1%
FEMALE POVERTY
98.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
55th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Japan vs Immigrants from Sri Lanka Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 339,963,649 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Japan and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.855 and weighted average of 11.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 149,673,263 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sri Lanka and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.210 and weighted average of 12.1%, a difference of 1.2%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Japan | Immigrants from Sri Lanka |
| Minimum | 2.9% | 1.4% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 21.1% |
| Range | 97.1% | 19.7% |
| Mean | 21.6% | 10.3% |
| Median | 10.3% | 10.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.2% | 6.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.1% | 13.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.0% | 6.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 24.6% | 4.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 24.4% | 4.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Japan and Immigrants from Sri Lanka by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Japan are Immigrants from Romania (12.0%, a difference of 0.19%), Slovene (12.0%, a difference of 0.20%), Asian (11.9%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (12.0%, a difference of 0.42%), and Turkish (11.9%, a difference of 0.44%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Sri Lanka are Estonian (12.1%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Serbia (12.1%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Philippines (12.1%, a difference of 0.35%), Scandinavian (12.1%, a difference of 0.39%), and Immigrants from Europe (12.1%, a difference of 0.40%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Czechs | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 99.2 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Koreans | 99.2 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Tongans | 99.2 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.2 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Turks | 99.2 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Asians | 99.1 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 99.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Slovenes | 98.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.9 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 98.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 98.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 98.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 98.5 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Estonians | 98.3 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 98.3 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Scandinavians | 98.2 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 98.2 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 98.1 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 98.1 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 12.2% |