Immigrants from Cuba vs Immigrants from El Salvador Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Cuba
Immigrants from El Salvador
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Cuba
Immigrants from El Salvador
12.9%
MALE POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
251st/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.8%
MALE POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
246th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Cuba vs Immigrants from El Salvador Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 325,880,105 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cuba and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.111 and weighted average of 12.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 357,646,043 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from El Salvador and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.054 and weighted average of 12.8%, a difference of 0.59%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Cuba | Immigrants from El Salvador |
Minimum | 3.3% | 2.2% |
Maximum | 28.9% | 30.5% |
Range | 25.5% | 28.3% |
Mean | 13.2% | 12.6% |
Median | 12.6% | 12.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.9% | 9.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.1% | 14.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.2% | 4.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.5% | 4.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.5% | 4.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from El Salvador by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Cuba are Immigrants from Ecuador (12.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Ghana (12.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (12.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Potawatomi (12.9%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Sudan (12.9%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from El Salvador are Liberian (12.8%, a difference of 0.30%), Tsimshian (12.8%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Western Africa (12.9%, a difference of 0.35%), Immigrants from Sudan (12.9%, a difference of 0.41%), and Alaskan Athabascan (12.8%, a difference of 0.42%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Ecuadorians | 0.4 /100 | #238 | Tragic 12.7% |
Ghanaians | 0.4 /100 | #239 | Tragic 12.7% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.4 /100 | #240 | Tragic 12.7% |
Sudanese | 0.3 /100 | #241 | Tragic 12.8% |
Nepalese | 0.3 /100 | #242 | Tragic 12.8% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 12.8% |
Tsimshian | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 12.8% |
Liberians | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 12.8% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.2 /100 | #246 | Tragic 12.8% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.2 /100 | #247 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 0.2 /100 | #248 | Tragic 12.9% |
Potawatomi | 0.2 /100 | #249 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.2 /100 | #250 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.2 /100 | #251 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.2 /100 | #252 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 12.9% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #254 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #255 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #256 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 13.1% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 13.1% |