Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Kazakhstan Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Oceania
Immigrants from Kazakhstan
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Oceania
Immigrants from Kazakhstan
13.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
59.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
166th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
78.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
147th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Kazakhstan Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,339,012 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.177 and weighted average of 13.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 124,418,226 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Kazakhstan and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.059 and weighted average of 13.0%, a difference of 2.2%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Oceania | Immigrants from Kazakhstan |
Minimum | 10.7% | 0.34% |
Maximum | 44.6% | 29.8% |
Range | 33.9% | 29.4% |
Mean | 16.8% | 11.9% |
Median | 15.5% | 12.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.2% | 9.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.0% | 14.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.8% | 5.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.8% | 5.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.7% | 5.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Kazakhstan by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Scotch-Irish (13.3%, a difference of 0.24%), Ethiopian (13.3%, a difference of 0.26%), Guamanian/Chamorro (13.3%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Albania (13.3%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Ethiopia (13.3%, a difference of 0.28%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Kazakhstan are Immigrants from Peru (13.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Yugoslavian (13.1%, a difference of 0.25%), Taiwanese (13.1%, a difference of 0.41%), Tsimshian (13.1%, a difference of 0.44%), and Immigrants from Germany (13.1%, a difference of 0.51%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Peru | 79.1 /100 | #146 | Good 13.0% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 13.0% |
Yugoslavians | 76.9 /100 | #148 | Good 13.1% |
Taiwanese | 75.7 /100 | #149 | Good 13.1% |
Tsimshian | 75.5 /100 | #150 | Good 13.1% |
Immigrants | Germany | 74.9 /100 | #151 | Good 13.1% |
Samoans | 73.6 /100 | #152 | Good 13.1% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 71.0 /100 | #153 | Good 13.2% |
Armenians | 70.4 /100 | #154 | Good 13.2% |
Hungarians | 70.1 /100 | #155 | Good 13.2% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 69.7 /100 | #156 | Good 13.2% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 68.8 /100 | #157 | Good 13.2% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 67.3 /100 | #158 | Good 13.2% |
Costa Ricans | 63.6 /100 | #159 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 62.7 /100 | #160 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #161 | Good 13.3% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 62.4 /100 | #162 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Albania | 62.4 /100 | #163 | Good 13.3% |
Ethiopians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 13.3% |
Scotch-Irish | 62.1 /100 | #165 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 59.7 /100 | #166 | Average 13.3% |