Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Potawatomi Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Potawatomi
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Potawatomi
13.0%
MALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
256th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.9%
MALE POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
249th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Potawatomi Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 172,258,093 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.026 and weighted average of 13.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,745,310 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Potawatomi and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.642 and weighted average of 12.9%, a difference of 0.87%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar | Potawatomi |
Minimum | 3.9% | 4.4% |
Maximum | 30.5% | 59.6% |
Range | 26.6% | 55.1% |
Mean | 14.5% | 18.0% |
Median | 13.5% | 16.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.6% | 11.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.0% | 21.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.5% | 9.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.0% | 11.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.9% | 10.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Potawatomi by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar are Immigrants from Liberia (13.0%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (13.1%, a difference of 0.26%), Mexican American Indian (13.0%, a difference of 0.29%), Cape Verdean (13.1%, a difference of 0.39%), and Cherokee (13.1%, a difference of 0.55%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Potawatomi are Immigrants from Nicaragua (12.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Sudan (12.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Cuba (12.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Western Africa (12.9%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Ecuador (12.9%, a difference of 0.14%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Nepalese | 0.3 /100 | #242 | Tragic 12.8% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 12.8% |
Tsimshian | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 12.8% |
Liberians | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 12.8% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.2 /100 | #246 | Tragic 12.8% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.2 /100 | #247 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 0.2 /100 | #248 | Tragic 12.9% |
Potawatomi | 0.2 /100 | #249 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.2 /100 | #250 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.2 /100 | #251 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.2 /100 | #252 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 12.9% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #254 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #255 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #256 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 13.1% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 13.1% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 13.1% |
Ottawa | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 13.1% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 13.1% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 13.1% |