Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Iroquois Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Iroquois
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Iroquois
13.0%
MALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
256th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.2%
MALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
264th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Iroquois Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 172,258,093 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.026 and weighted average of 13.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,214,183 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.608 and weighted average of 13.2%, a difference of 1.5%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar | Iroquois |
| Minimum | 3.9% | 3.6% |
| Maximum | 30.5% | 100.0% |
| Range | 26.6% | 96.4% |
| Mean | 14.5% | 19.1% |
| Median | 13.5% | 14.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.6% | 11.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.0% | 19.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.5% | 7.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.0% | 16.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.9% | 16.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Iroquois by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar are Immigrants from Liberia (13.0%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (13.1%, a difference of 0.26%), Mexican American Indian (13.0%, a difference of 0.29%), Cape Verdean (13.1%, a difference of 0.39%), and Cherokee (13.1%, a difference of 0.55%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Jamaican (13.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Guyana (13.2%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Jamaica (13.3%, a difference of 0.28%), Subsaharan African (13.3%, a difference of 0.30%), and Central American (13.2%, a difference of 0.36%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.2 /100 | #250 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 0.2 /100 | #251 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.2 /100 | #252 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #254 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #255 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #256 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Ottawa | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #269 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Cree | 0.0 /100 | #270 | Tragic 13.3% |