Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Cape Verdean Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Cape Verdean
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Cape Verdeans
13.0%
MALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
256th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.1%
MALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
258th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Cape Verdean Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 172,258,093 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.026 and weighted average of 13.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 107,527,352 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Cape Verdeans and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.087 and weighted average of 13.1%, a difference of 0.39%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar | Cape Verdean |
Minimum | 3.9% | 3.0% |
Maximum | 30.5% | 31.5% |
Range | 26.6% | 28.5% |
Mean | 14.5% | 12.7% |
Median | 13.5% | 11.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.6% | 8.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.0% | 16.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.5% | 8.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.0% | 6.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.9% | 6.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Cape Verdeans by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar are Immigrants from Liberia (13.0%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (13.1%, a difference of 0.26%), Mexican American Indian (13.0%, a difference of 0.29%), Cherokee (13.1%, a difference of 0.55%), and Ottawa (13.1%, a difference of 0.67%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cape Verdeans are Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (13.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Cherokee (13.1%, a difference of 0.16%), Ottawa (13.1%, a difference of 0.28%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (13.1%, a difference of 0.30%), and Spanish American Indian (13.1%, a difference of 0.35%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.2 /100 | #247 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 0.2 /100 | #248 | Tragic 12.9% |
Potawatomi | 0.2 /100 | #249 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.2 /100 | #250 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.2 /100 | #251 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.2 /100 | #252 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 12.9% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #254 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #255 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #256 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 13.1% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 13.1% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 13.1% |
Ottawa | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 13.1% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 13.1% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 13.1% |
Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 13.2% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 13.2% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 13.2% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 13.2% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 13.3% |