Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Ecuadorian Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Ecuadorian
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Ecuadorians
13.0%
MALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
256th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.7%
MALE POVERTY
0.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
238th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Ecuadorian Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 172,258,093 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.026 and weighted average of 13.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,549,368 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.055 and weighted average of 12.7%, a difference of 2.6%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar | Ecuadorian |
Minimum | 3.9% | 0.81% |
Maximum | 30.5% | 27.8% |
Range | 26.6% | 27.0% |
Mean | 14.5% | 12.3% |
Median | 13.5% | 11.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.6% | 9.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.0% | 15.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.5% | 6.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.0% | 5.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.9% | 5.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Ecuadorians by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar are Immigrants from Liberia (13.0%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (13.1%, a difference of 0.26%), Mexican American Indian (13.0%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Ghana (12.9%, a difference of 0.68%), and Immigrants from Ecuador (12.9%, a difference of 0.73%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ecuadorians are Ghanaian (12.7%, a difference of 0.0%), French American Indian (12.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (12.7%, a difference of 0.28%), Sudanese (12.8%, a difference of 0.64%), and Nepalese (12.8%, a difference of 0.80%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
French American Indians | 0.4 /100 | #237 | Tragic 12.7% |
Ecuadorians | 0.4 /100 | #238 | Tragic 12.7% |
Ghanaians | 0.4 /100 | #239 | Tragic 12.7% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.4 /100 | #240 | Tragic 12.7% |
Sudanese | 0.3 /100 | #241 | Tragic 12.8% |
Nepalese | 0.3 /100 | #242 | Tragic 12.8% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 12.8% |
Tsimshian | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 12.8% |
Liberians | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 12.8% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.2 /100 | #246 | Tragic 12.8% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.2 /100 | #247 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 0.2 /100 | #248 | Tragic 12.9% |
Potawatomi | 0.2 /100 | #249 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.2 /100 | #250 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.2 /100 | #251 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.2 /100 | #252 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 12.9% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #254 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #255 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #256 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 13.1% |