European vs Zimbabwean Male Poverty
COMPARE
European
Zimbabwean
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Europeans
Zimbabweans
10.2%
MALE POVERTY
97.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
71st/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.2%
MALE POVERTY
97.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
65th/ 347
METRIC RANK
European vs Zimbabwean Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 560,421,320 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Europeans and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.642 and weighted average of 10.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,180,294 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.027 and weighted average of 10.2%, a difference of 0.41%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | European | Zimbabwean |
Minimum | 0.73% | 1.2% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 18.8% |
Range | 99.3% | 17.7% |
Mean | 17.4% | 8.1% |
Median | 11.4% | 8.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.8% | 5.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.1% | 11.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.3% | 5.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 17.0% | 4.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.9% | 4.1% |
Demographics Similar to Europeans and Zimbabweans by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Europeans are Immigrants from Canada (10.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Paraguayan (10.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Australia (10.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Asia (10.2%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Eastern Europe (10.2%, a difference of 0.16%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Serbian (10.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Swiss (10.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Netherlands (10.2%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (10.2%, a difference of 0.24%), and Slovak (10.2%, a difference of 0.30%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Scandinavians | 98.0 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Immigrants | Europe | 97.9 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Ukrainians | 97.9 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Austrians | 97.8 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Immigrants | Italy | 97.8 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Slovaks | 97.7 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Swiss | 97.5 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Zimbabweans | 97.5 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Serbians | 97.5 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 97.3 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 97.2 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | Australia | 97.1 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Paraguayans | 97.1 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Europeans | 97.1 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | Canada | 97.1 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | Asia | 97.0 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 96.9 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 96.9 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Dutch | 96.9 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 96.8 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Irish | 96.8 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 10.3% |