Immigrants from Norway vs Immigrants from Belarus Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Norway
Immigrants from Belarus
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Norway
Immigrants from Belarus
10.7%
MALE POVERTY
86.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
125th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.7%
MALE POVERTY
83.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
131st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Norway vs Immigrants from Belarus Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 116,684,379 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Norway and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.476 and weighted average of 10.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 150,164,106 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belarus and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.074 and weighted average of 10.7%, a difference of 0.54%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Norway | Immigrants from Belarus |
Minimum | 0.44% | 0.12% |
Maximum | 58.1% | 26.1% |
Range | 57.6% | 25.9% |
Mean | 9.4% | 10.6% |
Median | 7.1% | 9.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.2% | 7.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.7% | 12.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.6% | 5.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.3% | 5.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.1% | 5.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Belarus by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Norway are French (10.7%, a difference of 0.15%), South African (10.7%, a difference of 0.18%), Native Hawaiian (10.7%, a difference of 0.22%), Peruvian (10.7%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from China (10.7%, a difference of 0.25%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Belarus are Immigrants from Vietnam (10.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Pakistani (10.8%, a difference of 0.060%), New Zealander (10.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Chilean (10.7%, a difference of 0.11%), and Brazilian (10.8%, a difference of 0.11%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Okinawans | 87.6 /100 | #118 | Excellent 10.7% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 87.6 /100 | #119 | Excellent 10.7% |
Immigrants | China | 87.1 /100 | #120 | Excellent 10.7% |
Peruvians | 87.1 /100 | #121 | Excellent 10.7% |
Native Hawaiians | 87.0 /100 | #122 | Excellent 10.7% |
South Africans | 86.8 /100 | #123 | Excellent 10.7% |
French | 86.7 /100 | #124 | Excellent 10.7% |
Immigrants | Norway | 86.0 /100 | #125 | Excellent 10.7% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 84.3 /100 | #126 | Excellent 10.7% |
Puget Sound Salish | 84.3 /100 | #127 | Excellent 10.7% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 84.2 /100 | #128 | Excellent 10.7% |
Immigrants | Peru | 84.1 /100 | #129 | Excellent 10.7% |
Chileans | 83.9 /100 | #130 | Excellent 10.7% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 83.3 /100 | #131 | Excellent 10.7% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 83.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 10.8% |
Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #133 | Excellent 10.8% |
New Zealanders | 82.9 /100 | #134 | Excellent 10.8% |
Brazilians | 82.7 /100 | #135 | Excellent 10.8% |
Immigrants | Israel | 80.9 /100 | #136 | Excellent 10.8% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 79.2 /100 | #137 | Good 10.8% |
Yugoslavians | 78.2 /100 | #138 | Good 10.8% |