Immigrants from Argentina vs Immigrants from Jordan Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Argentina
Immigrants from Jordan
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Argentina
Immigrants from Jordan
8.4%
FAMILY POVERTY
88.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
132nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
83.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
147th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Argentina vs Immigrants from Jordan Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 264,069,938 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Argentina and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.182 and weighted average of 8.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 181,199,618 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jordan and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.420 and weighted average of 8.5%, a difference of 1.5%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Argentina | Immigrants from Jordan |
Minimum | 2.3% | 0.79% |
Maximum | 26.5% | 38.9% |
Range | 24.3% | 38.1% |
Mean | 8.9% | 9.3% |
Median | 8.1% | 7.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.6% | 6.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.1% | 10.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.5% | 4.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.3% | 6.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.2% | 6.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Argentina and Immigrants from Jordan by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Argentina are Puget Sound Salish (8.4%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (8.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Portuguese (8.4%, a difference of 0.34%), Sri Lankan (8.5%, a difference of 0.50%), and Chilean (8.5%, a difference of 0.51%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Jordan are Immigrants from Belarus (8.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (8.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Albanian (8.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Germany (8.5%, a difference of 0.080%), and Yugoslavian (8.5%, a difference of 0.12%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Portuguese | 89.2 /100 | #129 | Excellent 8.4% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 88.6 /100 | #130 | Excellent 8.4% |
Puget Sound Salish | 88.6 /100 | #131 | Excellent 8.4% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 88.2 /100 | #132 | Excellent 8.4% |
Sri Lankans | 86.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 8.5% |
Chileans | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 86.5 /100 | #135 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 86.3 /100 | #136 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 86.0 /100 | #137 | Excellent 8.5% |
Armenians | 84.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 84.2 /100 | #139 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 84.1 /100 | #140 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 83.9 /100 | #141 | Excellent 8.5% |
Yugoslavians | 83.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Germany | 83.3 /100 | #143 | Excellent 8.5% |
Albanians | 83.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 83.2 /100 | #145 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 83.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 83.0 /100 | #147 | Excellent 8.5% |
Scotch-Irish | 82.2 /100 | #148 | Excellent 8.6% |
Mongolians | 80.4 /100 | #149 | Excellent 8.6% |